Cis Privilege Checklist « Taking Up Too Much Space

Cis Priv­i­lege Check­list « Tak­ing Up Too Much Space.

I’m sure you guys have seen this before.  I think this list has short­com­ings, as it posits a basis sim­i­lar to that of the white priv­i­lege check­list that it’s based on.  I’d like to write out a more elab­o­rate dis­cus­sion some­time about the ways these dif­fer­ent check­lists com­pare and contrast.

Does any­body agree that this check­list, while an excel­lent tool for cis­gen­dered peo­ple, doesn’t accom­plish the same thing as the white priv­i­lege check­list?  Or that the basis is flawed?

This entry was posted in Links, Queer, Trans, Gender and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

3 Comments

  1. Posted 13 Jan 09 at 20:11 | Permalink

    I’m inter­ested to hear your thoughts. What basis is it that I’m assuming–the addi­tive model of oppres­sion rather than the mul­ti­di­men­sional one? I don’t think it’s com­pletely naive that way, but it’d be a valid cri­tique, if it’s the one you’re making.

    What do you think the dif­fer­ence in accom­plish­ment is?

    Please feel free to com­ment over on TUTMS, too.

  2. Jac
    Posted 14 Jan 09 at 15:52 | Permalink

    I haven’t got­ten to read this through a thor­oughly as I’d like, but my first thought is that the White Priv­i­lege Check­list has things that dis­tin­guish major race-related issues from subtle-yet-poignant priv­i­lege. In this one, for exam­ple, health­care, pri­vacy, dis­crim­i­na­tion laws, etc. are out and out “trans issues” affected by pol­icy, prac­tice, etc. The White Priv­i­lege list has some of those issues, but most of them are sub­tle — one of my favorites is “I can chose blem­ish cover or ban­dages in “flesh” color and have them more or less match my skin.”

    Maybe trans issues don’t sur­prise me much any­more, so the list would be more poignant to some­one hear­ing it for the first time. When I think about my rela­tion to priv­i­lege in the daily bar­rage of assump­tions and assig­na­tions, I think more about day-to-day stuff like “I can cut my hair above my ears and no one mis­as­sumes my gen­der” or “If some­one uses the wrong pro­noun for me, they are put in an embar­rass­ing sit­u­a­tion and I am not.”

    (I promise to read the whole thing before talk­ing about it anymore…)

    • Posted 15 Jan 09 at 00:11 | Permalink

      Thanks for the thoughts. It’s true that some of the strik­ing things about the White Priv­i­lege check­list are sub­tle things. I might not have ever imag­ined that even find­ing ban­dages in my skin tone would arise as a prob­lem, and once it occurs to you, it’s shock­ing, how per­va­sive white priv­i­lege is.